🔗 Human PR review is next

Writing code went first. Reviewing it looks like it's going the same way. William Martin articulates the evolving landscape of code review, drawing parallels with the shift from manual coding to AI-assisted writing. He suggests that the future of review may lie in utilizing AI tools to automate the process, drastically reducing the need for line-by-line scrutiny. Current practices, traditionally grounded in human oversight, are being challenged as developers adapt to more advanced models. Martin counters common objections about AI-generated code, emphasizing that iterative improvements and automated checks can lead to better outcomes than solely relying on human reviewers. The article concludes by urging engineers to rethink review methodologies, highlighting the importance of rules and guardrails before the code, to maintain quality amidst increasing speed.